Jim Nasby escribió:
> I also have a vague memory of some features that would benefit from
> being able to have typemod info available at a tuple level in a table,
> not just for the entire table. Unfortunately I can't remember why we
> wanted that... (Alvaro, do you recall? I'm pretty sure it's something
> we'd discussed at some point.)
I don't remember anything concrete either. Maybe it was the E.164 type
stuff, where we wanted auxiliary info to dictate what kind of pattern to
{match on input, apply on output} ?
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
