Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names
Date
Msg-id 20130905210528.GA556998@alap2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2013-02-26 13:08:54 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> Just for reference, thats the grammar for SET/SHOW:
>
> var_name:    ColId                                { $$ = $1; }
>             | var_name '.' ColId
>
> Any arguments whether we should try to validate postgres -c,
> set_config and SET/SHOW the same?


Any input here?

Currently set_config() and postgres -c basically don't have any
restrictions on the passed guc name whereas SHOW, SET and
postgresql.conf do.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Is it necessary to rewrite table while increasing the scale of datatype numeric?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: strange IS NULL behaviour