Re: CREATE FUNCTION .. SET vs. pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: CREATE FUNCTION .. SET vs. pg_dump
Date
Msg-id 20130903181917.GX2706@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CREATE FUNCTION .. SET vs. pg_dump  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> So I think a more reasonable fix is just to skip the ProcessGUCArray
> call altogether when check_function_bodies = false, and to document
> that validators mustn't assume anything about the GUC environment
> when check_function_bodies = false.
>
> If no objections, I'll go fix it that way.

Works for me.
Thanks!
    Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE FUNCTION .. SET vs. pg_dump
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [9.3 doc fix] clarification of Solaris versions