* Hannu Krosing (hannu@2ndQuadrant.com) wrote:
> If you earlier used views for granting limited read access to some views
> you definitely did not want view users suddenly gain also write access to
> underlying table.
>
> You also probably did not GRANT only SELECT to your views as this was
> the default anyway,
I'm not really convinced that we should be catering to this argument of
"well, I knew it was gonna end up being read-only anyway, so I just
GRANT'd ALL"- consider that rules can make view writable, even in
existing releases.
Thanks,
Stephen
