Re: [BUGS] BUG #8335: trim() un-document behaviour - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [BUGS] BUG #8335: trim() un-document behaviour
Date
Msg-id 20130813033138.GH12510@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] BUG #8335: trim() un-document behaviour  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: [BUGS] BUG #8335: trim() un-document behaviour  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 05:19:30PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Attached are docs that add the new syntax, and mention it is
> non-standard;  you can see the output here:
>
>     http://momjian.us/tmp/pgsql/functions-string.html#FUNCTIONS-STRING-SQL
>
> We do document three syntaxes for substring() in the same table, one row
> for each, so there is precedent for doing this.

Attached is an updated patch with a proper example.  I could move the
extra syntax into the description of the existing trim entry instead.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: Modyfication Sort Merge Join Alghoritm
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: Foreground vacuum and buffer access strategy