Le lundi 12 août 2013 18:38:06, Magnus Hagander a écrit :
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Cédric Villemain
>
> <cedric@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > Le lundi 12 août 2013 15:51:51, Magnus Hagander a écrit :
> >> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> >> > On 08/06/2013 03:37 PM, David Johnston wrote:
> >> >> No idea if this is a known limitation in the beta-releases but using
> >> >> the website search interface while viewing the "without comments"
> >> >> documentation for 9.3 at
> >> >>
> >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/index.html
> >> >>
> >> >> gives: "Your search for collation returned no hits"
> >> >>
> >> >> for the handful of search terms that I tried to use.
> >> >>
> >> >> Doing the same while viewing 9.2 indeed gives search results as
> >> >> expected.
> >> >
> >> > Yeah, we generally don't build the search files for beta versions.
> >>
> >> "Search files" is an interesting term to use, but other than that,
> >> that's correct. I have an open ticket for modifying the system so it
> >> doesn't actually create a search box on those pages, since that
> >> indicates that they would be searchable.
> >
> > and what about have those searchable too? is it hard to refresh the devel
> > documenation when sgml is modified ?
>
> Not really, but right now that would put them on google as well, and
> we don't want people to get devel docs hits as their default hits off
> google.
not if we tell it (google) not to do so, but I understand the point.
> Incidentally, I believe there is a separate ticket for separating
> those two things into separate settings :)
ok
--
Cédric Villemain +33 (0)6 20 30 22 52
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/
PostgreSQL: Support 24x7 - Développement, Expertise et Formation
