Robert Haas escribió:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > heap_deform_tuple and slot_deform_tuple contain duplicated code. This
> > patch refactors them so that the guts are in a single place.
> >
> > I have checked the resulting assembly code for heap_deform_tuple, and
> > with the "inline" declaration, the gcc version I have (4.7.2) generates
> > almost identical output both after the patch than before, thus there
> > shouldn't be any slowdown.
>
> Although I'm generally in favor of eliminating duplicated code, I have
> to admit that in this case I'm not sure I see the point.
Yeah, I guess in isolation this doesn't make that much sense. I am
hesitant to create a third copy in the minmax patch, but I will do that
for now and propose the refactoring later.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
