On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:18:15PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> On 07/12/2013 10:49 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >
> >On 07/12/2013 01:28 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >>Josh Berkus wrote:
> >>
> >>>-- a couple of compromise proposals were made:
> >>>
> >>>a) that reviewers who do actual code modification of the patch get
> >>>credited on the feature, and those who just review it get credited at
> >>>the bottom of the release notes, or
> >>>
>
> >
> >I'd probably say "substantial" or "non-trivial", but otherwise +1
>
> Right cause if a reviewer ends up writing (or cleaning up) all the
> docs, I would say they deserve very close to equal credit. As an
> example.
I can do whatever we agree to in the release notes. The big question
is whether committers can properly document these people. I do think
the names are going to overwhelm the release note items and we will
_again_ remove some or all names.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
