On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:30:54AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Noah,
>
> > Attached patch just restores the old behavior. Would it be worth preserving
> > the ability to fix an index consistency problem with a REINDEX independent
> > from related heap consistency problems such as duplicate keys?
>
> I would love to have two versions of REINDEX, one which validated and
> one which didn't. Maybe a ( validate off ) type check?
>
+1 There are reasons to reindex that do not involve its validity and it would
be great to not need to visit the heap for that.
Regards,
Ken
