On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:44:51AM +0300, Ants Aasma wrote:
> On Jul 21, 2013 4:06 AM, "Noah Misch" <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> > If these hooks will need to apply to a larger operation, I
> > think that mandates a different means to reliably expose the before/after
> > object states.
>
> I haven't checked the code to see how it would fit the API, but what about
> taking a snapshot before altering and passing this to the hook. Would there
> be other issues besides performance? If the snapshot is taken only when
> there is a hook present then the performance can be fixed later.
That would work.
--
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
