Re: [PATCH] big test separation POC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [PATCH] big test separation POC
Date
Msg-id 20130711161900.GB29206@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] big test separation POC  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] big test separation POC
List pgsql-hackers
Fabien COELHO escribió:

> Note that this is really a POC. How to derive a file is under
> discussion: it has been suggested that the unix shell approach would
> not work on Windows. I've suggested perl or python (which version?)
> but I'm not sure that it is okay either.

The other option, suggested by Andres somewhere, is to have a new
parameter to pg_regress, something like --run-serially.  So you would
use the same parallel schedule file, but serially instead of following
the parallel specification.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gibheer
Date:
Subject: Patch for reserved connections for replication users
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Regex pattern with shorter back reference does NOT work as expected