Re: pg_resetxlog -m documentation not up to date - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: pg_resetxlog -m documentation not up to date
Date
Msg-id 20130701212544.GN3757@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_resetxlog -m documentation not up to date  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 6/19/13 9:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> Ping.  This ought to be fixed before 9.3 goes out.
> > 
> > Will fix.
> > 
> >> On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 21:22 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >>> The pg_resetxlog -m option was changed from
> 
> The man page lists the -m option as -m mxid,mxid, but the --help output
> has -m XID,XID.  Is that correct?  Do we consider MXIDs to be a subset
> of XIDs?

Yeah, mxids are stored in places that normally store Xids (namely a
tuples' Xmax field).  That said, I don't see any reason not to have
--help show -m MXID,MXID.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Randomisation for ensuring nlogn complexity in quicksort
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Documentation/help for materialized and recursive views