On 2013-07-01 07:14:23 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > If we had a different set of tests, that would be a valid argument. But
> > we don't, so it's not. And nobody has offered to write a feature to
> > split our tests either.
> With utmost respect, this just isn't true. There is a "make coverage"
> target that probably doesn't get enough exercise, but it's just the
> kind of infrastructure you're describing.
Uh? Isn't make coverage a target for collecting the generated coverage
data? Afaik it itself does *NOT* depend on any checks being run. And it
only does something sensible if --enable-coverage is passed to
./configure anyway.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
