Re: A better way than tweaking NTUP_PER_BUCKET - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: A better way than tweaking NTUP_PER_BUCKET
Date
Msg-id 20130626171937.GE5952@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A better way than tweaking NTUP_PER_BUCKET  (Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: A better way than tweaking NTUP_PER_BUCKET  (Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
* Atri Sharma (atri.jiit@gmail.com) wrote:
> Right, let me look.Although, I am pretty busy atm with ordered set
> functions, so will get it done maybe last week of this month.

Isn't it currently the last week of this month? :)  I'm guessing you
mean July.

> Another thing I believe in is that we should have multiple hashing
> functions for bloom filters, which generate different probability
> values so that the coverage is good.

I really don't see that happening, to be honest..  I think it would be
interesting to try some of the surrogate-additional-hashing that I
described.
Thanks,
    Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: Patch to compute Max LSN of Data Pages
Next
From: Atri Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: A better way than tweaking NTUP_PER_BUCKET