Re: [PATCH] add long options to pgbench (submission 1) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [PATCH] add long options to pgbench (submission 1)
Date
Msg-id 20130625161511.GC7716@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] add long options to pgbench (submission 1)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2013-06-25 12:11:06 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
> <fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
> >>> Please fix that and re-send the patch.
> >> Find attached diff wrt current master.
> > Thanks.
>
> I would like to solicit opinions on whether this is a good idea.  I
> understand that the patch author thinks it's a good idea, and I don't
> have a strong position either way.  But I want to hear what other
> people think.
>
> Anyone have an opinion?

+1. When writing scripts I like to use the long options because that
makes it easier to understand some time later. I don't really see a
reason not to do this.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add long options to pgbench (submission 1)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: isolationtester and 'specs' subdirectory