Re: Bugfix and new feature for PGXS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Cédric Villemain
Subject Re: Bugfix and new feature for PGXS
Date
Msg-id 201306192251.21313.cedric@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bugfix and new feature for PGXS  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Le mercredi 19 juin 2013 21:06:23, Alvaro Herrera a écrit :
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 6/19/13 12:20 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > > So you're saying to install extension headers, but into the main
> > > directory where we put server headers?
> >
> > Yes, if we choose to install some extension headers, that is where we
> > should put them.
>
> The question of the name of the directory still stands.  "contrib" would
> be the easiest answer, but it's slightly wrong because
> externally-supplied modules could also want to install headers.
> "extension" might be it, but there are things that aren't extensions
> (right?  if not, that would be my choice).

yes, I think the same.
auth_delay for example is not an extension as in CREATE EXTENSION. So...it is
probably better to postpone this decision and keep on the idea to just install
headers where there should be will traditional name (contrib).

--
Cédric Villemain +33 (0)6 20 30 22 52
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/
PostgreSQL: Support 24x7 - Développement, Expertise et Formation

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove useless USE_PGXS support in contrib
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: FP precision