On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 08:42:26PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> If we work by analogy to Postgres' own handling of Unicode escapes,
> we'll raise an error on any Unicode escape beyond ASCII (not on input
> for legacy reasons, but on trying to process such datums). I gather that
> would meet your objection.
No objection here; that approach is free from the problem that caught my
attention in the other proposal.
--
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
