Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0
Date
Msg-id 20130529035015.GA15045@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 03:06:13PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > I would have each data segment be self-identifying, i.e. have a magic
> > number at the beginning of the file and the relation OID, some fork
> > identification and the segment number somewhere -- probably the special
> > space of the first page.
> 
> Is this something we want on the TODO?  I was not clear how to do with
> without making the first page format special or wasting space on all the
> other pages.

I don't think the special space has to necessarily be identically sized
in all the pages -- I admit I haven't looked closely, but the special
size is part of the page header.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u