Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From 'Bruce Momjian'
Subject Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report
Date
Msg-id 20130516220653.GC16506@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>)
Responses Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 08:38:59PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > I usually mention items that have a user-visible change, or are easy to
> > explain, or apply to most queries.  I am not sure this falls into any
> > of
> > those categories.
> > 
> > Can you suggest some release note text for this item?
> 
> I can think of below text:
> 
> Reduce query processing overhead by avoiding insertion of useless plan nodes
> OR
> Improve performance of certain kind of queries by avoiding extra processing
> of doing projection
> 
> This applies to queries doing identity projection ("SELECT * FROM ...") for
> partitioned tables.

Uh, that's pretty complex for our release notes, and hard to understand
for most users.  All they will know is that PG is faster --- we don't
document every speedup.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Paul Hammond
Date:
Subject: PLJava for Postgres 9.2.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report