Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marko Kreen
Subject Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema
Date
Msg-id 20130513190004.GA11219@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
Responses Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 10:57:44PM +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Other than adminpack, I know of PGQ installing their objects in
> pg_catalog. They only began doing that when switching to the CREATE
> EXTENSION facility. And they set relocatable to false.

FYI - PgQ and related modules install no objects into pg_catalog.

I used schema='pg_catalog' because I had trouble getting schema='pgq'
to work.  I wanted 'pgq' schema to live and die with extension,
and that was only way I got it to work on 9.1.

-- 
marko




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Sort
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: 9.3 prepare plans - possible incompatibility