On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:10:14PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> > I'm more concerned about moving information which really should be in
> > the system catalogs out into magic files on disk..
>
> Right. The whole thing is just a kluge, which I'm convinced we'll
> regret sooner or later --- probably sooner. I would much rather drop
> unlogged matviews for now and put scannability status into pg_class
> where it belongs.
Right. I think the big question is whether we can add crash recovery
system catalog writes in the time before beta, and whether we would need
that even if we remove unlogged table support.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
