Re: Remaining beta blockers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Remaining beta blockers
Date
Msg-id 20130503161526.GF2467@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Remaining beta blockers  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Remaining beta blockers  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian escribió:
> On Fri, May  3, 2013 at 05:24:54PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:

> > The problem with an extra metadata fork is that it essentially would
> > double the files in a cluster and it would also noticeably increase the
> > amount of open files we need.
> > There have been quite some complaints about CREATE DATABASE speed, I
> > am not sure we want to make it even slower :(
>
> Agreed.  We start to get into file system performance issues at that
> point.  I have often wondered if we need to create hash the files into
> subdirectories for databases with many tables.  Has anyone profiled
> this?

Modern filesystems use trees to store file nowadays, not linear arrays,
and so that old scenario (long time to find one specific directory entry
within a directory containing lots of files) is no longer that serious a
problem.

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Remaining beta blockers
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Remaining beta blockers