On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 08:51:23AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 5:08 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > I have to admit I don't see the point. None of those values is particularly
> > interesting to anybody without implementation level knowledge and those
> > will likely deal with them just fine. And I find the version with the
> > shorter names far quicker to read.
> > The clarity win here doesn't seem to be worth the price of potentially
> > breaking some tools.
>
> +1.
FYI, pg_upgrade would certainly have to be updated to handle this
change.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
