Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized
Date
Msg-id 20130409173038.GB27905@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized  ("Stephen R. van den Berg" <srb@cuci.nl>)
Responses Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized
Success (Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2013-04-09 19:18:57 +0200, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >"Stephen R. van den Berg" <srb@cuci.nl> writes:
> >> Just today one of my systems experienced a kernel panic, and halted abruptly.
> >> Running Linux 3.1.9, PostgreSQL 9.0.4 (Debian 9.0.4-1+b1, to be precise).
> 
> >It's conceivable that updating to something more current than 9.0.4
> >would get you out of this --- we've fixed quite a number of WAL replay
> >bugs in the last two years.
> 
> I see that there is a 9.0.13, but that would be a source upgrade, since Debian
> doesn't provide later than 9.0.4 AFAICS.

Afaik debian has never shipped 9.0 in any stable release at all. You can
use the packages provided by the postgres community though, they are
compatible:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Apt

> I suppose upgrading to 9.1.9 is not recommended in this state, or is
> it?

You can at least try, don't think it will make more problems than you
already have.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: MV patch broke users of ExplainOneQuery_hook
Next
From: "Stephen R. van den Berg"
Date:
Subject: Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized