Fix for pg_upgrade and invalid indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Fix for pg_upgrade and invalid indexes
Date
Msg-id 20130329205706.GA12134@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Ignore invalid indexes in pg_dump.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Fix for pg_upgrade and invalid indexes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Fix for pg_upgrade and invalid indexes  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 05:27:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Should I just patch pg_upgrade to remove the "indisvalid", skip
> > "indisvalid" indexes, and backpatch it?  Users should be using the
> > version of pg_upgrade to match new pg_dump.  Is there any case where
> > they don't match?  Do I still need to check for "indisready"?
>
> Yeah, if you can just ignore !indisvalid indexes that should work fine.
> I see no need to look at indisready if you're doing that.

Attached is a patch that implements the suggested pg_upgrade changes of
not copying invalid indexes now that pg_dump doesn't dump them.  This
should be backpatched back to 8.4 to match pg_dump.  It might require
release note updates;  not sure.  Previously pg_upgrade threw an error
if invalid indexes exist, but only since February, when we released the
pg_upgrade fix to do this.  You can see the majority of this patch is
removing that check.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Hash Join cost estimates
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Getting to 9.3 beta