On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 06:06:18PM +0000, Greg Stark wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > And we definitely looked at ARC
>
> We didn't just look at it. At least one release used it. Then patent
> issues were raised (and I think the implementation had some contention
> problems).
The problem was cache line overhead between CPUs to manage the ARC
queues.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
