Zoltan,
* Boszormenyi Zoltan (zb@cybertec.at) wrote:
> If we get rid of the per-statement variant, there is no need for that either.
For my 2c, I didn't see Tom's comments as saying that we shouldn't have
that capability, just that the implementation was ugly. :)
That said, perhaps we should just drop it for now, get the lock_timeout
piece solid, and then come back to the question about lock_timeout_stmt.
Thanks,
Stephen
