Re: logging full queries separately - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From ktm@rice.edu
Subject Re: logging full queries separately
Date
Msg-id 20130223163528.GB19991@aart.rice.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to logging full queries separately  (Charles Sprickman <spork@biglist.com>)
List pgsql-admin
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 12:55:07AM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I've been finding that keeping full query logs is quite helpful; I started doing this to be able to run pgbadger each
dayto get a nice overview of what's going on with the db servers.  The one huge downside to this is that the logs are
sonoisy, it's hard to track down errors and stats real-time since the query logging is so noisy. 
>
> Looking at the manual, I don't see any creative solutions to split the query logs off from the rest of the logs.  Is
thereanything I've overlooked to take care of this? 
>
> Right now I'm considering just switching to syslog-ng or rsyslog and seeing if there's a way I can parse the
non-querymessages out and dump them in another logfile…  Any pointers on that?  Without breaking compatibility with
pgbadger,what log_line_prefix might make it easier to pick out statements (even when they span multiple lines)? 
>
> Thanks,
>
> Charles
>

Hi Charles,

Using syslog will work well for this. I would definitely recommend rsyslog
over syslog-ng. We have a system running both and rsyslog is more efficient
with less overhead and is less costly than syslog-ng for some functionality.

Regards,
Ken


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Charles Sprickman
Date:
Subject: logging full queries separately
Next
From: John Rouillard
Date:
Subject: Re: logging full queries separately