On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:41:06PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:50:12PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> (looks at the whole section) As-is, it's definitely not good, because
> >> before there were three independent examples, and now there are three
> >> and a half --- the added example depends on the variables declared in
> >> the third example. But using the blank line means you've formatted it
> >> as a stand-alone fourth example, which is not only wrong in itself but
> >> it screws up the meanings of both of the subsequent paragraphs.
>
> > OK, how is this? The C comment allows me to add 'or'.
>
> It's still completely failing to address the problem that it's formatted
> as a fourth, independent example. Please remove the blank line.
How is this?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
