Re: Doc patch, normalize search_path in index - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Doc patch, normalize search_path in index
Date
Msg-id 20130125184143.GF6848@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Doc patch, normalize search_path in index  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Doc patch, normalize search_path in index
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:35:49PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > I have applied a modified version of your patch that creates separate
> > secondary index references for search_path.
> 
> This patch seems pretty bizarre.  What is the difference between a
> "configuration parameter" and a "run-time setting"?  Why would you
> point people to two different places for those two terms?

I think he is trying to distinguish between the parameter and the
setting of the parameter, and also its use for security.  No one really
replied to the email so I thought the distinction was accpetable.

Should I make them both "configuration parameter" and leave the
"security" as a second one separate?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dhruv Ahuja
Date:
Subject: Re: "pg_ctl promote" exit status
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Doc patch, normalize search_path in index