On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:50:12PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:25:32PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> ! EXEC SQL CONNECT TO :target USER :user USING :passwd;
> >>> !
> >>> ! EXEC SQL CONNECT TO :target USER :user/:passwd;
>
> >> This sure looks like it has broken the intention of the paragraph
> >> immediately after the example. Also, it seems like you are providing
> >> two alternative ways of doing the same thing, but not explaining that.
> >> How is a reader supposed to know that he doesn't have to do both
> >> commands?
>
> > Yeah, I was worried about that, so I added the blank line. If you look
> > at the docs, we already are providing three connection examples, so now
> > there are four. You can see the current docs here (the official ones
> > are not updated yet):
> > http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/ecpg-connect.html#ECPG-CONNECTING
> > I am open to suggestions.
>
> (looks at the whole section) As-is, it's definitely not good, because
> before there were three independent examples, and now there are three
> and a half --- the added example depends on the variables declared in
> the third example. But using the blank line means you've formatted it
> as a stand-alone fourth example, which is not only wrong in itself but
> it screws up the meanings of both of the subsequent paragraphs.
>
> Perhaps changing that blank line to something like " /* or */" would
> help? Then it would look more like an alternative within the same
> example, which would also help with making the following two paras
> still be sensible.
OK, how is this? The C comment allows me to add 'or'.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
