* Bruce Momjian (bruce@momjian.us) wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 06:19:09PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > But presumably this would transparently compress at one end and
> > decompress at the other end, which is again a somewhat different use
> > case. To get compressed output on the client side, you have to
> > decompress and recompress. Maybe that's OK, but it's not quite the
> > same thing.
>
> Is there a TODO here?
For some reason, I thought there was a patch...
Thanks,
Stephen
