* Bruce Momjian (bruce@momjian.us) wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:55:04AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Peter Eisentraut (peter_e@gmx.net) wrote:
> > > Operating on compressed files transparently in file_fdw is obviously
> > > useful, but why only gzip?
> >
> > This isn't really an argument, imv. It's only gzip *right this moment*
> > because that's all that I implemented. I've already offered to add
> > bzip2 or whatever else people would like.
>
> And this leads to support-my-compression-binary-of-the-day mess. Why
> not just allow them to do '|compression-binary'?
You're right, to clarify, for *file_fdw*, which is a backend-only
operation, the popen patch is great (thought I made that clear before).
The popen patch doesn't support the '|compression-binary' option through
the FE protocol. Even if it did, it would only be available for
superusers as we can't allow regular users to run arbitrary commands on
the server-side.
Thanks,
Stephen
