Re: PL/perl should fail on configure, not make - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Aaron W. Swenson
Subject Re: PL/perl should fail on configure, not make
Date
Msg-id 20130111030934.GA6696@gengoff.grandmasfridge.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PL/perl should fail on configure, not make  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PL/perl should fail on configure, not make
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 08:12:56PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> > OK, now I'm sorry I brought this up.
>
> Sorry about going off on a theological tangent.  The important question
> at this point is, can anybody fix the test so it works on Gentoo?
> If not we'll have to pull it out, whether or not it would be a good
> thing to have on Debian.
>
>             regards, tom lane

I can give it a go.

At any rate, I'll have to fix the problem before I
can release the package to the Portage tree, even if that means I remove
the test.

--
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
Gentoo Linux Developer
Email : titanofold@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 2C00 7719 4F85 FB07 A49C 0E31 5713 AA03 D1BB FDA0
GnuPG ID : D1BBFDA0

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Possible PANIC in PostPrepare_Locks
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/perl should fail on configure, not make