Josh Berkus wrote:
> The, shared_buffers, wal_buffers, and effective_cache_size (and possible
> other future settings) can be set to -1. If they are set to -1, then we
> use the figure:
>
> shared_buffers = available_ram * 0.25
> (with a ceiling of 8GB)
> wal_buffers = available_ram * 0.05
> (with a ceiling of 32MB)
> effective_cache_size = available_ram * 0.75
> (with a floor of 128MB)
>
> If they are set to an amount, then we use the amount they are set to.
>
> It would be nice to also automatically set work_mem, maint_work_mem,
> temp_buffers, etc. based on the above, but that would be considerably
> more difficult and require performance testing we haven't done yet.
My starting point for work_mem is usually:
work_mem = available_ram * 0.25 / max_connections
Like everything else, I might adjust from there, but it seems like
a sane starting point. Of course, one could easily argue for a
lower percentage or exclusion of some number of maint_work_mem
allocations.
-Kevin
