On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:21:13AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail@joh.to> writes:
> > While we can do the actual splitting of objects from a -Fc dump
> > relatively easily, we can't fix the view definitions after they've
> > been dumped. So I'm proposing a --pretty-print-views setting to
> > pg_dump (patch attached).
>
> -1. The reason that pg_dump does not pretty-print things is that
> it's unsafe; there is no real guarantee that the view will reload as
> intended, because it's under-parenthesized. (Even if we were sure
> it would reload safely into current code, which I'm not, what of
> future versions that could have different operator precedences?)
Under what circumstances do pretty-printed views not reload? It seems
to me that such circumstances would be pretty_print() bugs by
definition.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
