KaiGai,
* Kohei KaiGai (kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp) wrote:
> IMO, only "parser" should accept command types except for ALL but
> raise an error something like "it is not supported yet" to protect from
> syntax conflicts.
Right, I agree with this.
> Right now, I plan to submit a revised patch with the syntax support
> above, and without support for INSERT or NEW of UPDATE checks,
> as minimum set of functionality for v9.3.
Sounds good.
Thanks,
Stephen
