Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 11:03 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > I think this (have a config option, and have SIGHUP work as expected)
> > would be useful to demo in worker_spi, if you care to submit a patch.
>
> Yeah, I would love too. Reading the code of worker_spi, we could add one
> or three parameters: a naptime, and the schemaname for both bgprocess.
> One would be enough or do you prefer all three?
I got no problem with three.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
