Re: enhanced error fields - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: enhanced error fields
Date
Msg-id 20121230033245.GJ16126@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: enhanced error fields  (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: enhanced error fields  (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
* Peter Geoghegan (peter@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> On 30 December 2012 02:01, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> > I really don't think what I sketched out or something similar would
> > happen.  I do think it's incredibly frustrating as a user who is trying
> > to develop an application which behaves correctly to be given only half
> > the information.
>
> I don't know what to say to that. Sometimes, when deciding how to
> address problems like this, it's possible to arrive at slightly
> surprising answers by process of elimination.

Err.  I intended to say "I really don't think what I sketched out, or
something similar, would be that unlikely to happen", or something along
those lines.  Apologies for the confusion.
Thanks,
    Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Farina
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Documentation bug for LDAP authentication