Re: enhanced error fields - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: enhanced error fields
Date
Msg-id 20121230020104.GH16126@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: enhanced error fields  (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: enhanced error fields  (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter,

* Peter Geoghegan (peter@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> In order for the problem you describe to happen, the user would have
> to ignore the warning in the documentation about constraint_name's
> ability to uniquely identify something, and then have two constraints
> in play at the same time with the same name but substantively
> different. That seems incredibly unlikely.

I really don't think what I sketched out or something similar would
happen.  I do think it's incredibly frustrating as a user who is trying
to develop an application which behaves correctly to be given only half
the information.
Thanks,
    Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: enhanced error fields
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation