Re: [GENERAL] trouble with pg_upgrade 9.0 -> 9.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:35:11PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > There is another table "ВерсияВнешнегоДокумента$Документ" (without ^lob.)
> > It is referenced by a foreign key ("rlob.ВерсияВнешнегоДокумента$Документ-@Файл")
> > But as I understand it, the problem with the primary key.
> 
> Does the old database have a table with prefix "plob.", called
> plob.ВерсияВнешнегоДокумента$Документ?
> 
> If not, if you do pg_dumpall --schema-only --binary-upgrade, is there a
> table with that name mentioned?

Also, when you say "rlob" above, is the 'r' a Latin letter sound that
would look like a Russian 'p' in the error message?  (In Cyrillic, a
Latin-looking p sounds like Latin-sounding r.)

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +