On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:06:13PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> > * Andrew Dunstan (andrew@dunslane.net) wrote:
> >> Making the user fix it seems much more sensible to me. Otherwise I
> >> suspect we'll find users who get strangely surprised when they can
> >> no longer find any trace of an expected index in their upgraded
> >> database.
>
> > Or preserve it as-is.
>
> To do that, we would have to add an option to CREATE INDEX to create it
> in an invalid state. Which is stupid...
I think we would have have pg_dump --binary-upgrade issue an UPDATE to
the system catalogs to mark it as invalid.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
