Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

On 2012-11-28 16:34:55 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 28.11.2012 15:47, Andres Freund wrote:
> >I mean the label read by read_backup_label(). Jeff's mail indicated it
> >had CHECKPOINT_LOCATION at 1/188D8120 but redo started at 1/CD89E48.
>
> That's correct. The checkpoint was at 1/188D8120, but it's redo pointer was
> earlier, at 1/CD89E48, so that's where redo had to start.

Heh. I I just compared 18 with CD and didn't notice the different length
of both...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
 Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services