Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables
Date
Msg-id 20121112212233.GD12157@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Bruce Momjian escribió:

> It is possible that the poor 16k pg_upgrade value is caused by the poor
> 9.2 binary-upgrade number (189.38).  Perhaps I need to hack up
> pg_upgrade to allow a 9.3 to 9.3 upgrade to test this.

Hmm?  This already works, since "make check" uses it, right?

--

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol