* Josh Berkus (josh@agliodbs.com) wrote:
> Because Snowman asked me for an example:
Thanks. :)
> That's a 25X difference in execution time. This is not the first time
> I've seen this issue.
If we can figure out an 'easy' solution to this, I'd definitely vote for
it being back-patched. Having a table simply never get analyze'd
strikes me as a very bad thing.
Thanks again,
Stephen
