Re: velog + vereport? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: velog + vereport?
Date
Msg-id 201210121756.35668.andres@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: velog + vereport?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: velog + vereport?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Friday, October 12, 2012 04:59:39 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > On Friday, October 12, 2012 02:48:42 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Um ... and that accomplishes what?  You wouldn't have velog/vereport
> >> outside the backend either.  If you were going to clone those in some
> >> form in the external environment, you might as well clone the existing
> >> elog infrastructure functions.
> > 
> > The advantage is that if you something velog-ish you can have a function
> > which accepts vararg arguments and forwards them.
> > E.g.
> > xlogreader->error(ERROR, "...", argument, argument);
> 
> Meh.  I can't get excited about that, but in any case, that looks like
> it would only justify a varargs version of errmsg(), not the entire
> ereport infrastructure.
Yes, that sounds good enough. Are you vetoing that idea (in that case I won't 
pursue it) or just aren't excited about it?

Andres

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: line type
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: velog + vereport?