Re: Using Different Ports for Multiple PosgreSQL Installations: Any Issues? - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Using Different Ports for Multiple PosgreSQL Installations: Any Issues?
Date
Msg-id 20121001164059.GA7922@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Using Different Ports for Multiple PosgreSQL Installations: Any Issues?  (Tom Browder <tom.browder@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Using Different Ports for Multiple PosgreSQL Installations: Any Issues?
List pgsql-novice
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:56:24AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Ye Chuah <yechuah@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I run multiple instances of postgres on unix sockets without any
> > problems. Do you have to use a port? If not, just use the sockets.
>
> Hm, I need remote access so I think I have to use a port, correct?
>
> And really, I won't be using more than one instance except for a short
> while during the upgrade of the data.

FYI, the postgresql.conf port setting actually controls the TCP port and
is embedded in the unix domain socket name, so port really controls
both.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: Tovo Rabemanantsoa
Date:
Subject: Re: Error 1920
Next
From: Tom Browder
Date:
Subject: Re: Using Different Ports for Multiple PosgreSQL Installations: Any Issues?