Re: 9.0 to 9.2 pg_upgrade pain due to collation mismatch - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: 9.0 to 9.2 pg_upgrade pain due to collation mismatch
Date
Msg-id 20120912200310.GA32353@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.0 to 9.2 pg_upgrade pain due to collation mismatch  ("Henry C." <henka@cityweb.co.za>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:54:57PM +0200, Henry C. wrote:
>
> Thanks to all who responded - upgrade was successful!
>
> One final note, when using pg_upgrade ... --link, it finally recommends
> use of delete_old_cluster.sh to remove the old data files.  I'm tempted,
> but --link re-uses old data files,... bit of a contradiction there, if you
> follow my meaning?
>
> Is use of delete_old_cluster.sh ok if --link used with pg_upgrade?

Link creates hard links between the old and new cluster.  Removing the
old cluster just changes the file link count from 2 to 1.  Is there a
way to make that clearer?

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Henry C."
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.0 to 9.2 pg_upgrade pain due to collation mismatch
Next
From: Dann Corbit
Date:
Subject: how long to wait on 9.2 bitrock installer?