On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:12:52AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 09/04/2012 10:49 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:42:58AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >>Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of mar sep 04 01:16:39 -0300 2012:
> >>
> >>>And here's the first Windows buildfarm check of pg_upgrade.
> >>><http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=pitta&dt=2012-09-04%2003%3A00%3A05&stg=check-pg_upgrade>
> >>Great, thanks.
> >>
> >>Who's going to work now on porting the shell script to Perl? ;-)
> >Well, we require Perl for development, but not for usage, at least not
> >yet. There was talk of needing Perl for doing standby pg_upgrade, but
> >there were too many concerns about that idea.
>
>
> This is a test script, not what you should use in production. I
> don't see any reason why we shouldn't require Perl for running the
> standard test.
Oh, I thought he was talking about the scripts pg_upgrade creates for
users to run. Sorry.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +