Re: We're not lax enough about maximum time zone offset from UTC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: We're not lax enough about maximum time zone offset from UTC
Date
Msg-id 20120830205302.GY8753@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: We're not lax enough about maximum time zone offset from UTC  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:51:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 06:10:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> However, as pointed out by Patric, if you dump and restore an old
> >> timestamptz value in one of these zones, it will fail to restore because
> >> of the sanity check.  I think therefore that we'd better enlarge the
> >> allowed range to 15:59:59 either way.
> 
> > Any status on this?
> 
> Shipped in last week's updates.

Thank you.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: --disable-shared is entirely broken these days
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] pg_dump and thousands of schemas